Roll Call

By Justin Papp

New York Republican settles into Washington after November upset

Being a Republican in deep-blue New York, Mike Lawler is used to being a perennial underdog.

Yet the 36-year-old first-term congressman has churned out a series of wins in largely Democratic districts and ascended quickly through the ranks of local, state and now national politics. In November, he toppled Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee Chair Sean Patrick Maloney in what was one of the most shocking upsets of the midterms.

Lawler’s just getting settled in Washington — empty boxes were piled along a wall in the lobby of his Longworth office and the walls were still mostly bare in late January — but he’s already learned one thing. “This is a rough and tumble business in Washington, more so than any state capital,” said the former state assemblyman. “Politics ain’t beanbag.”

He met with Heard on the Hill near the end of his first month in office and reflected on his early days in Washington, his embattled New York colleague George Santos and whether his vow to work with anyone and everyone will stand the test of time. 

This interview has been edited and condensed.

Q: You’re a New York guy. So what are your sports loyalties?

A: Yankees, Giants, Rangers. I still remember watching every game of the 1994 Stanley Cup finals.

I was a vendor at Yankee Stadium when I was in college, so I got to watch every game for free. I got to meet everyday people from all walks of life, and it certainly puts your salesmanship skills to the test. I had hotdogs, soda, Cracker Jacks, peanuts — it would vary. It was a union job and seniority-based, so the beer guys were there from the 1970s.

If I had to say a basketball team, it would be the Knicks. But it’s probably my least favorite sport.

Q: You scored one of the bigger upsets this cycle, unseating DCCC Chair Sean Patrick Maloney. How did you pull that off? And can you repeat the victory with Democrats gunning for the seat?

A: I think there were a few factors. Number one, redistricting produced a fair set of maps in New York, so there were a lot of competitive districts. 

Number two, Democrats controlled everything in Washington, Albany and New York City for the first time in our nation’s history, and they created a mess. 

And number three, I was from the district, born and raised. I’ve lived there my whole life. Maloney only represented a quarter of it, so he didn’t have that built-in advantage of incumbency. 

I stayed hyper-focused on the issues that mattered to voters, like affordability and crime. I was campaigning everywhere, doing six, seven, eight events a day, while he was galavanting the globe in London, Geneva and Paris with a month to go. 

I’ve won two elections in a row in heavily Democratic districts. I won a two-to-one Democratic district for the state assembly in 2020 in a presidential year, and I won this district, which has 70,000 more Democrats than Republicans. Folks can underestimate me at their own peril.

Q: You’ve called on Rep. George Santos to resign as his résumé and campaign finances come under scrutiny. But for now, he’s still a part of the New York delegation. Have you had contact with him?

A: There’s no relationship, and certainly the freshman members of the delegation are not dealing with him at all. His conduct is embarrassing and unbecoming, and frankly, the fact that he really has not taken responsibility in a serious and meaningful way just reflects very poorly on his ability to do his job.

Q: While campaigning, you said you were willing to work with everybody from Kevin McCarthy to Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. Can you really do that?

A: Absolutely. You know, I did a press conference just a few weeks ago with Josh Gottheimer, the Democrat from New Jersey, and I’ve already signed on to a number of bills introduced by Democrats and have sought their co-sponsorships on legislation I’m introducing. 

You need to be able to build relationships within your own conference and across the aisle, especially coming from a district like mine. My objective is to get things done.

I went to the president’s reception [last month], and I will continue to work those channels. [At the same time], the White House needs to recognize that there is no longer one-party rule, and they can’t just circumvent the speaker. They need to negotiate in good faith. 

Q: When you say you want to get things done, what does that include?

A: All of us who got elected in the House Republican majority, we did so to be a check and balance on the Biden administration. And that starts with spending. 

We need to get on the path toward a balanced budget. If you go back and look at any major spending reforms in our nation’s history, they have almost always been tied to the debt ceiling. So I don’t find this to be shocking or new. This is a reality, and it’s a tool that we in the House have to force the White House to the table.

Obviously, I want to lift the cap on SALT, to ensure that especially my constituents, who live in a high tax area, can afford to live there.

And we need to secure our border and really fix our immigration system once and for all. My wife is an immigrant. This is not about being anti-immigrant. It’s about having a system in place that actually works.

Quick hits

Favorite concert? My first concert was The Beach Boys, way back when in the ’90s. I went to see The Who with my dad before he died, and I also saw Michael Jackson’s last concert four days before 9/11.

Last book you read? “When Character Was King” by Peggy Noonan, about Ronald Reagan.

One thing you’ve learned this month? Politics ain’t beanbag.

Least popular opinion? My unabashed support for natural gas.

In politics, do the ends justify the means? No, you need to have integrity in everything you do.

The Journal News

By David McKay Wilson

U.S. Rep. Mike Lawler’s bill to double the deductibility of state and local taxes for married couples is the latest attempt by a New York political leader to either undo or soften the impact of Trump-era tax reforms that have penalized homeowners in high-tax states like New York.

Lawler’s bill to make the state-and-local-tax deduction cap – known as the SALT cap – more palatable comes two years before the $10,000-limit on SALT deductions, and the accompanying tax cuts for individuals and businesses passed in 2017, will expire at the end of 2025.

Lawler, R-Pearl River, said the bill would eliminate what he calls the “marriage penalty” in the current regulations. The regulations allow single filers to deduct $10,000 in SALT payments from their taxable income. But married couples filing jointly have the same limit. If married partners file separately, they can only claim $5,000 each.

Lawler, who says he wants to cut government spending to help rein in the federal deficit, declined to disclose what the measure would cost the federal government in lost tax revenue nor what government spending he would cut to make up for the loss.

He said the cost of his bill was “negligible” when compared to the cost of eliminating the cap, which the Brookings Institute has estimated at $85 billion a year.

“As we move forward in the budget process, and work to reduce wasteful government spending, this change will provide tax relief for hardworking Hudson Valley families, who will see a return of thousands of dollars to their pockets at a time they need it most,” he said.

Lawler in November ousted US Rep. Sean Patrick Maloney, D-Cold Spring, whose home ended up in the 17^th Congressional District following redistricting. That district comprised about 75% of the former district of Rep. Mondaire Jones, who decided not to primary Maloney, and moved to Brooklyn in an unsuccessful bid to win a Democratic primary there.

Jones has since moved back to Westchester, and now lives in Sleepy Hollow, which is located in the 17^th District.

Jones doubted that House Republicans will rectify the damage done in 2017.

“Republicans were the ones who capped the deduction at $10,000, and here this guy is trying to suggest that Republicans will provide relief to residents in the Hudson Valley,” said Jones, who debuted Wednesday evening at his new gig as an on-air commentator on CNN. “It’s a modest attempt to rectify the great damage done by Republicans in December 2017.”

Whether Lawler can find traction among a bipartisan coalition in Congress remains to be seen. The bill’s co-sponsors include Rep. Anthony Esposito, a Long Island Republican, and Rep. Mikie Sherill, D-NJ.

Lawler said he’s counting on the 14 Republicans from New York and New Jersey and 12 Republicans from California to form a coalition that could help sway the Republican conference.

He believes he can convince the Republican-controlled House to pass it.

“We are a formidable voting bloc that can move or not move legislation,” he said. “For the purposes of getting something done on SALT, that is an avenue we may pursue.”

Democrat attempts

Democrats couldn’t get it done when they controlled both houses of Congress and the presidency. At the time, Westchester County was ground-zero for press conferences by Gov. Andrew Cuomo, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, and Rep. Tom Suozzi, D-Nassau, who made his SALT deduction campaign a centerpiece of his failed bid for the Democratic nomination for NY governor.

Assemblywoman Amy Paulin, D-Scarsdale, tried as well, leading the effort that convinced the village of Scarsdale to sue the IRS after it announced a regulation that prohibited municipalities from setting up charitable funds that New York Democrats believed could be used to circumvent the SALT cap. That case lingers in US District Court in Manhattan, with no action in the case since the fall of 2021 as the village awaits a ruling from Judge Paul Gardephe.

In 2021, House Democrats upped the cap on SALT deductions to $80,000 in the Build Back Better legislation, an addition to the massive spending bill insisted upon by some New York and New Jersey members of Congress.

But that bill, which passed the House, failed to win Senate approval. A scaled-back bill that passed in 2022 did not include raising the SALT deduction cap.

Frank Clemente, executive director of Americans for Tax Fairness, said the fight over continuation of the Trump tax cuts in 2025 is expected to become a major issue in the 2024 presidential campaign and Congressional elections. The cap on SALT deductions are certain to be part of that debate, he said.

“If Congress does nothing, it will revert to the original deduction, which will be great for the rich in high-tax states like New York,” he said.

Republicans wanted the cap on deductions

 House Republicans were adamant in 2017 that the SALT deductions be capped as a way to pay for the Trump tax cuts.

Now Republicans, including Lawler, are concerned with the rise in the federal deficit, which was fueled in part by the tax cuts.

In 2023, those concerns about the federal deficit have led to warning that they will not approve raising the federal debt limit unless Democrats agree to cuts in federal spending, which could include reductions in Social Security and Medicare.

Lawler in January voted for the House Republican plan to rescind $80 billion to restructure the IRS that was approved by the Democratic majority and signed by President Biden in 2022. That action, which lacks support in the Democrat-controlled Senate, would add an estimated $114 billion to the federal deficit over 10 years, according to a Congressional Budget Office report.

Lawler said he’ll rely on his expertise learned at Manhattan College and running his political consulting firm when he takes aim with the budget knife at the burgeoning federal budget.

“As someone who graduated with an accounting degree from Manhattan College and who also owns a small business, I know the importance of going line-by-line through any budget to save costs and produce a long-term plan that closes the deficit and reduces our debt.”

New York Post

By Zach Williams and Carl Campanile

Republican members of Congress say they have had it with Gov. Kathy Hochul’s “radical state takeover” of local government following her controversial proposal to build 800,000 new housing units — even over the objections of local planning boards.

The criticism comes in a letter, exclusively obtained by The Post, that reads: “While we all understand the need for increasing the availability of housing, especially affordable housing, we cannot support a one-size fits all approach to local zoning.

“By forcing unit quotes onto municipalities and by providing little to no investment for critical infrastructure upgrades, you will create chaos.”

The letter – signed by the entire GOP state delegation except for lying Rep. George Santos (R-Nassau), who was intentionally left off the missive – highlights the difficulty Hochul will have in shaking up suburban housing rules nearly one year after abandoning an effort to overrule local zoning laws by loosening restrictions on granny flats and other Accessory Dwelling Units.

Her new proposal mandates that cities meet targets to increase their housing stock by several percentage points annually while requiring changes to building rules close to public transit.

“Simply put, a mandatory rezoning of neighborhoods within half a mile of MTA, Metro North or Long Island Rail Road stations, would be a radical state takeover of a local government function,” the reps said in the letter organized by freshman congressman Mike Lawler (R-Pearl River).

Also signing the letter were Reps. Elise Stefanik (R-North Country), Nicole Malliotakis (R-Staten Island), Nick LaLota (R-Nassau), Andrew Garbarino (R-South Shore), Anthony D’Esposito (R-Suffolk), Marc Molinaro (R-Hudson Valley), Claudia Tenney (R-Central NY), Brandon Williams (R-Central NY) and Nick Langworthy (R-Western NY).

“Our local governments are already drowning under unfunded mandates and dictates from the state — the absolute last thing we should be doing is adding to their burden with this wrongheaded and unconstitutional plan,” Langworthy said.

The GOP reps say that approach would effectively “eliminate home rule altogether” while providing a “recipe for disaster” by straining local roads, water, sewage, transit, schools and emergency services unprepared to accommodate big population increases.

“I’m startled by this attempt at a sweeping state mandate that would eliminate centuries of legal precedent and render towns, villages, and cities incapable of deciding for themselves how they want their neighborhoods to look,” Lawler said.

Hochul spokesman Justin Henry pushed back at GOP suggestions that the governor was trying to strong-arm local communities by pushing them to promote the construction of more housing amid ongoing shortages and rising prices.

“To address the severe housing crisis plaguing New York State, Governor Hochul proposed a bold plan to create 800,000 new homes in the next decade by working collaboratively and flexibly with cities and towns that need more housing,” Henry said.

“Gov. Hochul is eager to work on solving the housing crisis and making New York more affordable with any elected leader who wants to be part of the solution,” he added.

Rockland County Times

By Joe Kuhn, Managing Editor

Congressman Lawler (NY-17) is working to reverse a recent change in federal policy that has left many New Yorkers with a much higher tax bill. On Monday, Lawler took the first steps toward realizing his campaign promise to dismantle the S.A.L.T. cap put in place by former president Trump, which limits the amount of state taxes that a U.S. citizen can deduct from their federal taxes. In a state such as New York, which carries some of the highest tax rates in the U.S., the $ 10,000 cap on state tax reductions has presented a finical burden to many families . 

Standing outside Clarkstown Town Hall and flanked by County Executive Ed Day, Clarkstown Town Supervisor George Hoehmann, Ramapo Supervisor Michael Specht, Orangetown Supervisor Teresa Kenny, and Stony Point Supervisor Jim Monaghan, Lawler announced his introduction of a new bill intended to ease the tax burden facing families in states with higher tax rates, the “SALT Marriage Penalty Elimination Act.”

“Hudson Valley families suffer under some of the highest taxes in the nation,” said Rep. Lawler. “The misguided SALT tax cap has only added to their pain in recent years. That’s why I’m proud to introduce the SALT Marriage Penalty Elimination Act; this bill will double the cap for married couples filing jointly to $20,000,” continued Rep. Lawler. “It’s the first in a series of bills, which I’m calling the Hudson Valley Affordability Pact, that will tackle cost-of-living and affordability issues in the 17th Congressional District and beyond.

“The SALT Marriage Penalty Elimination Act, combined with the Anti-Congestion Tax Act, is the first step in providing real relief to Hudson Valley families and commuters,” concluded Rep. Lawler. “While I am committed to fully repealing the SALT Cap, this is a measure we can enact this year as we work towards that larger goal.”

The SALT Marriage Penalty Elimination Act removes a penalty imposed on married individuals in the current tax code, doubling the cap for joint filers. It is co-sponsored by Rep. Mikie Sherrill (NJ-11) and Rep. Anthony D’Esposito (NY-4).

NBC New York

By Tracie Strahan

The MTA has long argued that congestion pricing is essential to their bottom line and would to their bottom line and would net them $1 billion annually

A big-time bipartisan pushback is taking place against congestion pricing in Manhattan.

Lawmakers on both sides of the Hudson River that say they are going to introduce legislation that prohibits drivers from paying more to get into town.

An anti-congestion tax being introduced Thursday by U.S. representatives Josh Gottheimer (D-NJ) and Mike Lawler (R-NY) would prohibit the U.S. Department of Transportation from awarding any new capital investment grants to MTA projects in New York City until drivers from all New Jersey and the outer boroughs crossings into Manhattan would get exemptions from any congestion tax.

At the same time, it would also change the U.S. Tax Code to offer commuters a federal tax credit at the end of the year that would be equal to the amount they paid in congestion tax.

The MTA’s congestion pricing plan has been discussed for more than a decade now. It’s the plan that would charge drivers, especially from New Jersey, $23 to enter Manhattan below 60th Street. The pricing plan has yet to be implemented.

The MTA has long argued that congestion pricing is essential to their bottom line and would net them $1 billion annually.

Chief of External Relations for the MTA John McCarthy said in part: “Surely from his time in Albany, Congressman Lawler is aware that congestion pricing is established New York State law. Anyone serious about the environment and reducing gridlock understands that congestion pricing is good for the environment, good for getting fire trucks, buses, and delivery vehicles through the city, and good for the 90% of people who depend on mass people who depend on mass transit.”

The anti-congestion tax announcement is already getting pushback not only from the MTA, but New York Gov. Kathy Hochul, who said that congestion pricing is still on its way to taking place. She said it will protect the environment and fund the MTA — even as elected leaders threaten to freeze those funds.

“We’re not deterred by the sideshows may be happening elsewhere,” Hochul said.

CBS News New York

By Kristie Keleshian & Elijah Westbrook

FORT LEE, N.J. — Bipartisan, cross-state legislation was announced Thursday to stop congestion pricing, which could cost drivers up to $23 to cross through Midtown and below.

The plan was devised by lawmakers in New Jersey and New York.

“We are not an ATM for the MTA,” Rep. Mike Lawler said.

The message agreed upon by Lawler, a Republican from New York, and Rep. Josh Gottheimer, a New Jersey Democrat, is illustrated in the proposed Anti-Congestion Pricing Act.

Congestion pricing plan would implement tolls when entering the Central Business District of Manhattan, which is essentially Midtown from 60th Street down.

It could cost drivers an additional $23 when passing through, which is an estimated $5,000 per year per car, all in the hopes of driving cars and trucks out of the area and reducing traffic.

“If they’re going to steal more money from our families, the idea that they’re also going to try to take federal tax dollars people pay is outrageous. So, they’ll lose their federal subsidies that they get every single year,” Gottheimer said.

Gotthiemer was describing just one part of the Anti-Congestion Pricing Act, which would prohibit federal capital investment grants from going towards the MTA until drivers receive any tax exemption for congestion pricing, and also rewrite the tax code to give drivers who go through those tolls a federal tax credit.

At an unrelated press conference on Thursday, New York Gov. Kathy Hochul showed unwavering support for congestion pricing.

“It is moving on the path forward. We are not deterred by people holding press conferences, I assure you,” Hochul said.

Governor Hochul says she is undeterred and will push forward with congestion pricing, taxing suburban commuters for coming into Manhattan. If so, New York should be prepared to forgo federal funding for the bloated, mismanaged MTA. @GovKathyHochul

— Mike Lawler (@lawler4ny) January 19, 2023

Across the Hudson River at another press conference, New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy said he can’t get behind double-taxing New Jersey drivers.

“If you had a reliable one-seat ride that you knew would be on time into Manhattan on a train or a bus that flew through on a bus lane that went to a state-of-the-art bus terminal, that would be one thing. But we don’t have that yet,” Murphy said.

Congestion pricing is hoped to reduce pollution from cars in the city, but those in opposition believe it will only shift traffic to places like the George Washington Bridge in Fort Lee, possibly increasing air pollution.

“But to just add a toll is going to shift where congestion is. It will shift if to Fort Lee. It will shift it to the Bronx. It will shift it to Queens, and those are low-income communities already hurt by congestion in their communities,” Lawler said.

The MTA’s chief of external relations, John J. McCarthy said in a statement, in part, “Anyone serious about the environment and reducing gridlock understands that congestion pricing is good for the environment, good for getting fire trucks, buses and delivery vehicles through the city, and good for the 90% of people who depend on mass transit.”

The congressmen and Murphy are calling on the Biden administration to conduct an environmental impact study on congestion pricing before moving forward.

There is still no exact date on when congestion pricing would start, even though it was approved in 2019.

A spokesperson for Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said New York’s senior senator has already discussed the issue at the federal level and hopes that all the parties can come to a consensus.

New York Post

By David Meyer

A new bill in Congress would punish the MTA — by denying it needed federal funds — if it goes ahead with proposed tolls for car trips in Manhattan below 60th Street, two bipartisan bill sponsors say.

“We are introducing this bipartisan legislation to say to the MTA, if you are going to move forward with this — to say to (Gov.) Kathy Hochul, if you are going to move forward with this — then you don’t need our federal dollars anymore,” newly elected Rep. Mike Lawler (R-NY) said Thursday in Fort Lee, along with colleague Rep. Josh Gottheimer (D-NJ).

“Kathy Hochul and the mayor of New York City need to pull back on this ridiculous plan that harms suburban commuters, that negatively impacts our economy and that hurts working class and middle class families all across the region.”

Passed under Gov. Andrew Cuomo in 2019, the proposed tolls could be as high as $23 per vehicle when they go into effect in the next few years, according to a preliminary environmental assessment released by the MTA last summer.

That new toll could cost daily car commuters to the central business district $5,000 a year, the congressmen charged.

Gottheimer and Lawler’s bill would prohibit the US Department of Transportation from issuing grants to the MTA unless “drivers from Jersey and outer boroughs in New York crossings into Manhattan receive exemptions from any congestion tax.”

“New York City and the MTA are literally playing Russian roulette with their economy, and are willing to stick it to all those hardworking commuters from Jersey, the outer boroughs of New York city suburbs,” Gottheimer said.

“Many of us live in a mass transit desert, where there just aren’t a lot of options for mass transit. The families have to drive. Commuters have to drive. They have no other options.”

The MTA got over $15 billion in emergency aid to keep operating when COVID-19 decimated ridership levels in 2020. But ridership hasn’t recovered, and the authority says it’ll need more financial support in the near future to maintain its $19 billion operating budget.

Congestion pricing would fund the authority’s capital budget, which includes long-term improvements — including new elevators, modern subway signals and the next phase of the Second Ave. subway.

An MTA spokesman batted back at the lawmakers’ criticism, responding that 90% percent of commuters to Manhattan below 60th Street do not drive.

“Anyone serious about the environment and reducing gridlock understands that congestion pricing is good for the environment, good for getting fire trucks, buses and delivery vehicles through the city, and good for the 90% of people who depend on mass transit,” said John McCarthy, MTA Chief of External Relations.

Hochul told reporters Thursday she is “not deterred by people holding press conferences.”

“The congestion that we are experiencing in places like Manhattan are not sustainable,” she said. “It becomes paralyzing, whether it’s emergency vehicles or delivery trucks or the people who live there. It’s also a source of funding so we can continue investing in what is the lifeblood of the New York City region, which is our MTA.”

“I’m not deterred. They can do all the press conferences they want. It has no effect on me.,” she said.

Additional reporting by Zach Williams

News 12

Newly sworn-in District-17 Rep. Mike Lawler said Sunday he is already moving on from an inter-party fight that took four days to elect House Speaker Kevin McCarthy.

A group of about 20 Congress members kept voting against McCarthy, which angered their Republican colleagues. They wouldn’t give in until the 15th round of voting.

Lawler said he was on a team tasked with whipping votes and doing press interviews to keep Americans informed.

“All of us had a role to play in dealing with each other and trying to work through it together as a conference, and really try to land the plane here and get everybody on board,” Lawler said.

Lawler believes this fight that some opponents said would damage the Republican Party might end up strengthening it. As messy as it was, he said he is proud to have been a part of the solution.

“Sometimes it’s good to have real robust debate and discussion and I think, frankly, we don’t always see that in government,” Lawler added.

Lawler, who is on the record as not being a supporter of former President Donald Trump, credited him in helping end the fight.

“It speaks to his relationships with some of the people who were holding out, that he was able to speak to them and get them on board. I don’t think it says anything more than that, frankly,” Lawler said.

Lawler said now he can focus on his agenda of reining in government spending, increasing domestic oil production and fixing the immigration system.

He hopes to serve on the Finance and Foreign Affairs committees.

NPR

By Mallory Yu, Juana Summers, Alejandra Marquez Janse, & Courtney Dorning

It’s a time of transition on Capitol Hill. In the House of Representatives, Democrats are ceding the majority offices to the Republicans. As departing lawmakers pack up their things, first-time lawmakers are unpacking their belongings and getting ready to settle in.

Florida Democrat Maxwell Frost and New York Republican Mike Lawler are two of them.

“It’s a surreal experience,” Frost tells NPR. “I feel like time’s been going by super fast since Election Day.”

Frost is the first Gen Z member of Congress, and he recently made headlines for tweeting about being rejected for an apartment because of his credit rating. Lawler made headlines of his own, when he beat incumbent Congressman Sean Patrick Maloney, who led the Democrats’ national campaign committee. And he wasn’t alone; Republicans flipped four seats in New York, a state known for being reliably Democratic.

“We’re the reason there is a Republican majority in the House,” Lawler tells NPR. “I think there’s an opportunity to really work with our colleagues in the Republican conference, but also find opportunity working across the aisle.”

Lawler and Frost spoke with NPR about the new balance of power on Capitol Hill come January and how that might affect the way they work.

This interview has been edited for length and clarity.

Interview Highlights

Mike Lawler on where he sees himself fitting into the GOP’s ability to get things done

I think all of us have different experiences that shape our views, but it’s trying to weave those experiences together. My approach has always been as a legislator and as someone who’s been involved in politics for over 15 years, is to go build those personal relationships, sit down with somebody, get to understand what makes them feel the way that they feel about a certain issue and find the area of agreement and start to build on that. And so I think the question for both parties is, are there people within each conference that are really willing to do that work? It’s hard work and there’s going to be people pushing back from within. But you have to be willing to do that. I am. And certainly coming from New York and representing a district Joe Biden won by 10 points, you don’t get there by not being willing to meet people where they are.

Maxwell Frost on newly-elected House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and the future of the Democratic party

I’ve had the privilege of getting to know Hakeem, our future leader, Jeffries, for the last several months. Even during my campaign, he’s been very helpful. And, you know, I see a lot of myself in him. He’s a younger Black man who’s been fighting for progressive policies in the world that he believes in.

He’s expressed that it’s important that we have everyone come to the table. And we’ve been seeing him do that, from ensuring that there’s the best representation amongst Democratic leadership in having younger people, folks from our LGBTQ plus community, Black and Brown folks, people from just all across the country. He’s made it a point to ensure that he’s making the caucus leadership look like the country. That’s something that really excites me. And for me, that’s really the way forward. And, you know, our caucus, like any other family, sometimes we have our debates and arguments and everything. But I’m really excited about the future of this party.

Both House freshmen on accomplishing their priorities despite the potential of logjam in Congress

Frost: Like I said before, a political party is just like a family, and there’s going to be debates. But I think the important thing is, at the end of the day, we come together as a family again. And we work on the agenda that we’ve set. So that way, we can deliver for our people and the people that have sent us there. I will say, though: Yes, there are extremes on both sides – and outside – of Congress, that’s just kind of the way our country works. But one extreme I do view as dangerous [is the] calling to question our democracy. It’s hard to equate that to what others would consider the other extreme, which is, I guess, ensuring everybody has health care and that vast resources are dedicated to the climate crisis and things like that. I just don’t see it being the same, even though a lot of times in these conversations we equate them. And I just think it’s important to keep that in mind, because we have to protect our democracy. We have to ensure that we’re electing people who actually want to work across the aisle.

Lawler: Listen, I appreciate Maxwell’s sentiments, but I think part of the problem is that everybody is so quick to ascribe adjectives to those that they disagree with politically or to immediately question their motives. And frankly, I think that’s part of the problem. I think that is part of what is destructive to finding bipartisanship and finding compromise. And I think it’s nice to say that our extremes are radical and crazy and your extremes are just sincere in wanting to push policies that help the world. That’s a little bit of a broad statement, if you will. There are extremes on all sides. For instance, I think Joe Biden won the election. I think January 6th was wrong. But I also understand when people raise concerns about election integrity, you don’t just immediately dismiss that there are legitimate questions that get raised in the course of an election, and you have to address them from a policy perspective and a forward looking perspective. And I think we’re just at such a toxic point in our politics. It’s so easy to immediately jump in and say that person’s evil or that party and those people are bad. And I just don’t see where that helps anybody in this conversation or this process.

Spectrum News

By Susan Arbetter and Tim Williams

Despite a nationwide “red ripple,” the Republican Party saw a wave election in the Empire State on the congressional level with freshman state Assemblyman Mike Lawler toppling the chair of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee Sean Patrick Maloney in New York’s 17th Congressional District.

Lawler credits redistricting and voters wanting balance in a country, state and region heavily controlled by Democrats as reasons for his win.

Come January, Lawler will represent the district which covers parts or all of Rockland, Westchester, Putnam and Dutchess counties. According to the political blog Five Thirty Eight, the district is “lean Democratic” and has a Democrat+7 rating.

Due to redistricting, the district, which was mostly represented by Democrat Modaire Jones, also included parts of the district that Rep. Sean Patrick Maloney represented. After some political jostling, Maloney ran in the 17th, which included a smaller portion of his current district, while Jones left to run in the 10th District, where he lost the primary to Dan Goldman, who went on to win last week.

There was some confusion created by the redistricting process this cycle. Democrats held a supermajority in both state legislative houses and tried to implement maps that favored their party and could give them safer seats to run in. Those maps were eventually thrown out after a legal challenge went all the way to the state’s highest court. Blair Horner, executive director of the New York Public Interest Research Group, said the Democrats “fumbled the ball” on this and true reforms are needed. Horner argues that a “truly independent” commission that has full power to draw legislative maps is needed in New York.

With the changing lines and districts, Lawler argues that Maloney lost the incumbency advantage. Lawler said that voters also wanted a balance on Democratic power in D.C., the state government, and in New York City, where many of his new constituents commute to for work.

Lawler said the Republican Party needs to shift its focus away from former President Donald Trump and focus on solving the problems the country faces. In terms of the 2024 election, Lawler says he wants to hear from new voices like Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis rather than former President Trump.